By Janice Francis-Smith
THIS ARTICLE FIRST APPEARED IN THE Journal Record
OKLAHOMA
CITY – Only those who have
been to Europe or Japan
have seen what a real high-speed rail line can do, transportation officials
told lawmakers on Thursday. But the federal government is putting up the money
to make high-speed rail a reality in the U.S.
– maybe even in Oklahoma.
Tulsa and Oklahoma City are
the northernmost points on a proposed high-speed rail corridor extending down
to Austin and San Antonio, Texas,
which has already been approved by federal transportation officials. The U.S.
Department of Transportation has approved about a dozen high-speed rail
corridors around the country. But with costs of construction extending into the
millions or billions for true high-speed rail, few of the projects have
progressed beyond the beginning stages.
“No high-speed rail exists
yet in the U.S.,”
Gary Ridley, director of the Oklahoma Department of Transportation, told
members of the House Transportation Committee on Thursday. “But there is
potential.”
High-speed rail refers to
passenger trains that operate at speeds exceeding 124 miles per hour. The
closest thing to high-speed rail available in the U.S.
today is Amtrak’s Acela service, running from Washington,
D.C., to New York
and north to Boston.
The trip takes approximately two hours and 46 minutes at an average speed of 86
miles per hour – about half the speed of France's TGV trains.
President Barack Obama has
made a few public comments in support of high-speed rail for the U.S. as a means
to ease travel congestion while reducing the nation’s dependence on oil,
cutting pollution and creating jobs.
Included in the $787
billion stimulus plan Obama signed in February was $8 billion for high-speed
rail projects across the country, available as grants to states issued on a
competitive basis. By June, federal officials are expected to provide guidance
to states on how to apply for the funds.
California is perceived to have an advantage in the competition,
being the furthest along in the effort to build a high-speed rail line between San Francisco and Los
Angeles. Voters in California have already agreed to commit
millions in bond issues to the effort, building a rail line capable of handling
speeds of more than 220 miles per hour.
The $8 billion could go
quickly, given the high costs associated with building high-speed rail lines.
The California
project alone is estimated at $50 billion.
In Oklahoma,
officials have often considered building passenger rail service to connect Oklahoma City and Tulsa.
Consultant Jack Webb of Texas-based J. Webb and Associates said the Tulsa-Oklahoma City connection will one day be
essential to a nationwide effort to connect major cities via rail lines. Other
lines considered by both state and federal officials include links between Tulsa and Newton, Kan., and Oklahoma City
through to Kansas City, Mo.
But before any lines can be
seriously considered, four qualifiers must be met, said Ridley. The service in
question must be convenient to users, dependable, affordable and subsidized.
A passenger rail line
extending from Oklahoma City through Tulsa to Kansas
City could be created relatively inexpensively by
upgrading existing lines owned by the state, a process that would take five to
seven years to complete, Ridley said. Trains would travel no more than 70 miles
per hour, and with the delays of making stops and slowing for at-grade
crossings, travel by train between Oklahoma City
and Tulsa would
be no faster than driving the distance along the Turner Turnpike.
A new, high-speed rail line
could be constructed by extending the right of way for the turnpike, but the
cost of such a project would require an investment of about $250 million,
Ridley said.
Posted on Fri, March 20, 2009
by Crystal Drwenski
filed under